BCS DECLARES GERMANY WINNER OF WORLD WAR II

  • Thread starter Thread starter IRON37
  • Start date Start date
I

IRON37

Guest
BCS DECLARES GERMANY WINNER OF WORLD WAR II
US Ranked 4th

After determining the Big-12 championship game participants the BCS
computers were put to work on other major contests and today the BCS
declared Germany to be the winner of World War II.

"Germany put together an incredible number of victories beginning with
the annexation of Austria and the Sudetenland and continuing on into
conference play with defeats of Poland, France, Norway, Sweden, Denmark,
Belgium and the Netherlands. Their only losses came against the US and
Russia; however considering their entire body of work--including an
incredibly tough Strength of Schedule--our computers deemed them worthy
of the #1 ranking."

Questioned about the #4 ranking of the United States the BCS
commissioner stated "The US only had two major victories--Japan and
Germany. The computer models, unlike humans, aren't influenced by
head-to-head contests--they consider each contest to be only a single,
equally-weighted event."

German Chancellor Adolph Hiter said "Yes, we lost to the US; but we
defeated #2 ranked France in only 6 weeks." Herr Hitler has been
criticized for seeking dramatic victories to earn 'style points' to
enhance Germany's rankings. Hitler protested "Our contest with Poland
was in doubt until the final day and the conditions in Norway were
incredibly challenging and demanded the application of additional
forces."

The French ranking has also come under scrutiny. The BCS commented "
France had a single loss against Germany and following a preseason #1
ranking they only fell to #2."

Japan was ranked #3 with victories including Manchuria, Borneo and the
Philippines.
 
I live in Oklahoma but I totally agree with you. The BCS still needs to be done totally different. There's no way they can justify the way it is done currently. They can talk until they're blue in the face about how the points system and the computers make it work but it's all BS. One of the main problems came when Boise State beat OU and made a case for all the smaller schools. There are too many schools involved in the BSC. As everyone knows, a playoff would be the best option, however, again, you have to take into consideration all of the smaller schools and that would simply take too long. I really don't see an end to the BS at all. It's all about cashola..
 
i Don't see how oklahoma is ahead of texas and texas beat them head to head
 
I don't get it either bro. I'm not like a diehard OU Fan by any means. It makes one wonder what/who is really making the decisions...And if any money is somehow trading hands with no one knowing. Or possibly some sort of deals being made.. No matter what, I think it all boils down to money..
 
Forget OU and Texas....Boise St. or Utah should get a shot, both are undefeated....They will be the only ones left after Alabama loses this weekend....;)
 
Boise st.and utah don't play the schedule the SEC teams play
 

Trending

Back
Top