Fastest way to gain 10-15 lbs

  • Thread starter Thread starter iron addict
  • Start date Start date
I

iron addict

Guest
If the goal is to gain 10-15 lbs as absolutely fast as possible how would it best be accomplished? Probably the quickest way to do it would be working out all bodyparts twice a week doing 16 or so sets a bodypart, using low intensity, for sets of 10-12 reps. Add a bit of creatine and taurine, keep carb levels high, with perfect PWO nutrition, and, (this is the big and) IF you haven?t been training this way, you will likely soon be up 10, perhaps even 15 lbs of something that ?looks? like muscle??.Let me explain that statement.

Muscle growth occurs from sarcoplasmic and myofibrillar hypertrophy. Sarcoplasmic hypertrophy occurs from an increase in the non-contractile cellular fluid in the muscle. The sarcoplasma consists of nutrients, glycogen, capillaries, and mitochondria proliferation. This hypertrophy occurs most, and fastest from using lots of high rep sets and high frequency training. While it ?looks? like muscle, it does not actually perform the work, it is in effect the plumbing and energy systems of the muscle. This type of hypertrophy is responsible for approximately 25-35% of your overall mass.

Myofibrillar hypertrophy is an increase in the contractile protein of the muscle. This is the actual muscle tissue, and what does the work when you lift weights. This is functional muscle, not the ?fluff? that is achieved via Sarcoplasmic hypertrophy. Training for Myofibrillar hypertrophy is accomplished with reps in the 1-8 range, with some carryover to higher reps. This type of hypertrophy is what provides approximately 70% of your overall mass?probably what you should be focusing on.

So Joe bodybuilder decides he?s going to get ?buff? and starts his new routine. Each muscle twice a week, 16 sets a bodypart, and sets of 10-12 reps. Joe eats well and takes his creatine and taurine and within a few weeks, he?s swelling up! He is absolutely thrilled and is absolutely certain Arnold new his shit about bodybuilding. Now the downside??after the initial gains, primarily through increased nutrient loading the progress stops. And Joe has two options to make progress keep going; add volume, or add weight to the bar. Only problem is how far can you go with volume, 20-24 sets? Then what, 30?!?!?! Ok, Joe has to add weight to the bar to get bigger, but guess what? That kind of loading (volume/frequency/intensity/rep range) makes strength gains come at a snails pace if at all. And that is why so many spin their wheels week after week, month after month. They tried something that got them good results at first, and then when it quit working, they did everything but understand the mechanism as to why it worked, and how to get past their sticking point.

If you are to maximally develop your body, you want and need both types of hypertrophy, but too many focus on the wrong type of development at the expense of what really counts. If work capacity/recovery is limited, your focus should be almost exclusively devoted to Myofibrillar hypertrophy and bringing up your work capacity. If your work capacity is good, you can train both muscular systems concurrently for better results.

Iron Addict
 
twice a week sounds like over training to me, i think once a week with a high intensity workout and proper diet will get you where you want to be
 
Right now I train the body three times a week, works great. I however, divide up my volume.

The three most built guys in my gym are both high volume and relatively high frequency, i.e. more than once a week, be that a 5 day program or whatever rotation they are currently on. However, knowing your own body is key.

10 pounds I could do in a week with anadrol, however, it wont be 100% clean weight. :)
 
Mudge said:
Right now I train the body three times a week, works great. I however, divide up my volume.

The three most built guys in my gym are both high volume and relatively high frequency, i.e. more than once a week, be that a 5 day program or whatever rotation they are currently on. However, knowing your own body is key.

10 pounds I could do in a week with anadrol, however, it wont be 100% clean weight. :)
:iggthumpu long live the A-Bomb!!!!
 
I agree, no better way to put weight on fast and feel good doing it. Good joints strength and size. You just cant go wrong with vita A. I run A-dex and nolva and dont see much in the way of fat or water. I get smooth and big but not fat and sloppy like some attest to.
NTG
 
The biggest guys in my gym, are also the strongest, using the least volume, and a lot of rest-pause/negative work. I've seen "Fat" powerlifters do some cardio, strip off some bodyweight and absolutely look outstanding. Most powerlifters I know train in a 5x5 type manner - not that I agree with that either.

I can not/will not agree with using 12-16 sets per bodypart. There's no way I could get significantly stronger from workout to workout - set to set using that kind of volume. If I'm not getting stronger, then how do I knowing I'm being productive? How do I know I'm providing adequate stimulation for growth? How do I know that volume of work will yeild sarcoplasmic hypertrophy? What is the marker or indicator of sarcoplasmic hypertrophy that I can see everytime I'm in the gym?

Most importantly - is there any evidence to suggest that sarcoplasmic hypertrophy can't occur as a result of training strictly for myofibrillar hypertrophy? If it can't - then why does training for myofibrillar hypertrophy work? If it can- then way waste your time or recovery ability training for it if it will occur as a result from more productive training anyway?

Just hypothetical questions from someone that grows year round at a steady even pace by training with only 1 working set per bodypart.
 
xander_cage said:
Most importantly - is there any evidence to suggest that sarcoplasmic hypertrophy can't occur as a result of training strictly for myofibrillar hypertrophy? If it can't - then why does training for myofibrillar hypertrophy work? If it can- then way waste your time or recovery ability training for it if it will occur as a result from more productive training anyway?

Of course not, there is no 100% one or the other.
 
xander_cage said:
If it can- then way waste your time or recovery ability training for it if it will occur as a result from more productive training anyway?

:lue:
 
An Ideal program utilized growth in both IMO unlike this. This involves adjusting reps, and intensity while maintaing nutritional uptake for both.

This is not an ideal program for those looking to increase functional musle such as athletes and power lifters etc. For bodybuilding though this is a useful tool but I believe it should be accomplished a little differently so that you do not gain 10-15 lbs in a short time and then stagger at nothing for a period after.
 
Why would you adjust intensity??

Where does growth stimulation occur? 63% intensity, 73.8% intensity, 97.6% intensity, or 100% of your possible intensity at that specific moment?

Why would you adjust your rep scheme, unless you were either doing to few to create enough tissue damage, or so many that you failed for cardiovascular reasons over tissue exhaustion?

I see too little logic here, and too much assumption. God I sound like Mike, don't I? LOL.
 

New Posts

Trending

Back
Top