Thoughts on frag 172-191?

[Massimo1]

Does anyone have experiences with gh frag 172-191, good, bad, neutral?

 

[BigTex]

Looks good in animal research, but I got nothing from it when I used it. Never heard anything good about it. At one time, there was a modified version of frag, AOD-9604 = a stabilized analog of this fragment. The clinical testing done was unimpressive, and it was eventually abandoned because it simply didn't work. I would not spend the money on this stuff at all.

Want good fat-burning results, stick with HGH.

 

[Massimo1]

Looks good in animal research, but I got nothing from it when I used it. Never heard anything good about it. At one time, there was a modified version of frag, AOD-9604 = a stabilized analog of this fragment. The clinical testing done was unimpressive, and it was eventually abandoned because it simply didn't work. I would not spend the money on this stuff at all.

Want good fat-burning results, stick with HGH.

That's in-line with other comments I've heard. Thanks

 

[liftsiron]

Looks good in animal research, but I got nothing from it when I used it. Never heard anything good about it. At one time, there was a modified version of frag, AOD-9604 = a stabilized analog of this fragment. The clinical testing done was unimpressive, and it was eventually abandoned because it simply didn't work. I would not spend the money on this stuff at all.

Want good fat-burning results, stick with HGH.

I was going to say the exact same thing.

 

[Massimo1]

Use tesamorelin instead. FDA approved for fat loss - developed for HIV patients with lipodystrophy. Plenty of research you can find. It works through gh pathways. Not recommended without supervision if you are diabetic because, like gh, it raises blood glucose.